Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Block quote
Ordered list
Unordered list
Bold text
Emphasis
Superscript
Subscript
A meeting room maintenance SLA (service level agreement) is only worth having if it makes specific commitments: response times by priority, a schedule of preventive site visits, firmware management, an equipment inventory, an escalation protocol and a clear boundary of what is covered. A contract that does not spell these out is a general service contract, not an SLA. GHT-SYS is a Hungary-based audiovisual (AV) systems integrator. We also provide SLA-based maintenance for corporate meeting rooms, and when we review an existing contract, we regularly find that these are exactly the elements missing from it.
In short: A dependable AV maintenance SLA fixes six elements in writing, with numbers wherever possible: response times by priority, a preventive visit schedule, firmware management, an equipment inventory, an escalation protocol and the boundary of what is covered. If any of them is missing, the contract gives you only partial protection. The same six elements also work as a checklist for comparing two service offers.
An SLA is a measurable contractual commitment, while an ordinary service contract is a general promise. A service contract says: if something breaks, someone will come out and look at it when they have capacity. An SLA states how many hours they have to respond to a critical fault, how often they come for preventive checks, and what happens if they miss the agreed time.
The difference shows up in practice. If your contract has no priority logic, meaning it treats a boardroom that has gone down the same as a flickering display in a corridor, then it does not actually contain a service level. It contains a phone number.
Why is this so common? AV service and IT service used to be separate worlds, and SLAs were mostly attached to servers and networks. Today a Microsoft Teams Rooms system is an AV device and a network endpoint at the same time, so the SLA logic that is standard in IT applies to AV as well, but the content has to be tailored to the AV environment. Even so, most of the AV service contracts we have reviewed still follow the old, purely reactive pattern.
A good AV SLA contains six elements: response times by priority, preventive site visits, firmware management, an equipment inventory, an escalation protocol and a clear boundary of what is covered. It is complete only when all six appear in the contract text, ideally with numbers.
It is not enough because a service contract often covers only reactive call-outs, with no guaranteed response time and no preventive maintenance, and that usually comes to light only once something has already gone wrong. It is easy to conclude you are covered, because there is a contract. But a contract without specific commitments is worth very little.
It is like having breakdown cover for your car but no service plan. If it breaks down, it gets towed. Nobody looks at why it broke down, or when it will happen again.
Deferred maintenance also builds up. An article on AVIXA written from the facility manager’s perspective points out that deferring AV maintenance creates compounding problems. The more a meeting room is used, the higher the stakes of a postponed repair. A fault in a room that is rarely booked can be tolerated. A fault in a boardroom that hosts eight meetings a day cannot.
So what does all of this really cost? We have worked through the hidden costs of the reactive model separately.
Two AV service offers are best compared on the committed service level, not on price. The cheapest offer tends to be cheap because it includes no guaranteed response time, no preventive visits and no documentation. The six elements double as a list of questions: work through them point by point and you can compare any two offers.
| Element | What to ask the provider | What a vague answer tells you |
|---|---|---|
| Response time | What is the guaranteed response and restoration time for a boardroom outage? | There is no real SLA, only a phone number to call |
| Preventive visits | How many site checks are there per year, and what do you inspect? | The contract is purely reactive, and the number of faults will not fall |
| Firmware management | Who is responsible for device firmware after a Teams or Zoom update? | When a fault follows an update, responsibility lands with IT |
| Equipment inventory | Will I receive a regularly updated inventory and per-room reports? | Every fault diagnosis starts from scratch |
| Escalation | What happens if you do not fix it within the committed restoration time? | A critical fault can drag on with no end in sight |
| Coverage | What exactly is included in the price, and what is charged separately? | This is where disputes and unexpected invoices come from |
Which one should you choose? The offer that gives numerical answers to these questions may look more expensive at first. With the offer that is cheaper on paper, the missing elements show up later on the invoice, one call-out at a time.
An ordinary reactive service contract can be enough for a rarely used, low-stakes room, where an outage does not affect an important event. The six elements are still useful here, just for a different purpose: by going through them, you decide deliberately which ones you are giving up. Even in an ordinary contract, though, it is worth writing down the boundary of what is covered, because disputes start there too.
Where is the line? In our experience at GHT-SYS, it sits where the space is business-critical. For a boardroom, a meeting room used to receive clients, a hybrid room that hosts several meetings a day, or a conference room being prepared for an event, reactive cover falls short, because the fault shows up at the worst possible moment. The aim is not to put the most expensive contract on every room. The service level should match the role of the space.
The SLA decision typically goes wrong at three moments. At the request for quotation, when it asks only for a price, not for response times or a visit schedule. At contract signature, when nobody notices that the package covers fault repair but not prevention. And at the first serious fault, when it turns out there is no up-to-date equipment inventory, so the technician has to start everything from scratch.
When we at GHT-SYS take on an undocumented system that previously sat under a contract with no guaranteed response time, the first preventive visit often uncovers faults the client did not even know about. We walk through how taking on a system like this works in our article on orphaned AV systems.
Three steps will tell you whether your existing AV contract is a real SLA. For the first two, the contract and a phone call are enough.
An SLA is not a document to file away in a drawer. It is the yardstick you measure your partner’s work against.
A guaranteed response time is the period within which the service partner contractually commits to respond to a reported fault, with a different deadline for each priority level. A shorter deadline is realistic for a boardroom outage and a longer one for a fault on a corridor display, and the restoration time is worth fixing in the contract alongside it. If the contract contains no such figure, the response time in practice depends on how busy the partner happens to be.
Yes, because meeting room devices run firmware, and after a platform update they can become incompatible with each other. If the SLA does not say who is responsible for firmware, nobody takes ownership of an outage that follows an update, and the problem stays with the IT team. At GHT-SYS, we keep track of firmware status as part of the equipment inventory.
No, they are not the same: the logic is similar, but the AV layer needs different expertise from a server or a network device. A meeting room fault is immediately visible to users, frequently at an important moment, so response time and prevention carry more weight. An AV SLA has to be tailored to the AV environment, not lifted from the IT contract.
The frequency of preventive visits depends on how heavily the meeting rooms are used and how much the business relies on them, so there is no single correct number. A boardroom used several times a day needs checking more often than a small meeting room that is rarely booked. What matters is that the frequency appears in the contract as a number and that every visit produces a written report.
You find out by checking the contract point by point against the six elements: whether it includes numerical response times by priority, a preventive visit schedule, firmware management, an equipment inventory, escalation and a precise scope of coverage. If even one is missing, the contract gives only partial cover. At GHT-SYS, we review the contract and the meeting rooms together in this situation, because that shows what is actually in the rooms and what is missing from the package.
Ádám Horváth is the managing director, founding owner and a systems engineer at GHT-SYS.
About GHT-SYS: GHT-SYS is a Hungary-based audiovisual (AV) systems integrator. The company designs, installs and commissions integrated AV systems in Hungary and across Europe, and provides SLA-based maintenance for corporate clients in Hungary. If you would like to know what your existing AV contract covers and what is missing from it, book a consultation.
Related articles:
